How does intent affect a court case
It is worth noting that due to the confusion surrounding general and specific intent, some jurisdictions have adopted the Model Penal Code's approach of demonstrating intent by showing the degree of certainty a defendant had that his or her conduct would cause a certain result. In California , it is generally presumed that the defendant intended to perform an act which he or she has done.
However, for crimes that require specific intent, that intent must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. For example, for a conviction in attempted murder, which requires proof of specific intent to kill, a prosecution cannot rely on the fact that the defendant performed the act of killing in order to presume that the defendant had acted with an intention to kill.
The defendant, for example, might have acted out of self-defense , therefore negating the required intent because the killing was done out of protection and not the desire to take the victims life. You can learn more about what to expect from our free criminal defense consultations.
Our team at Cook Attorneys hopes to have the opportunity to support you in ensuring the best possible outcome for your case. Fill out the form below to request more information about how we can serve you.
We look forward to hearing from you! If you wish to contact us, please fill out the form below to request more information about how we can serve you. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies.
It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website. Category: Criminal defense. A person may not intend the consequences of his action, but can act recklessly and still be convicted.
Recklessness in this context is the taking of an unjustified risk. The common law classifies intention as either direct or oblique intention. There is direct intention where the defendant acted criminally with the direct intention to bring about a result. Oblique intention is where a person acts with the intention that the circumstances of their actions are virtually certain to occur. It may not always be clear whether the defendant intended or foresaw the consequences of their actions.
Specific Intent Crimes. Some crimes require proof that the defendant not only committed an illegal act, but also with an illegal purpose. General Intent Most crimes require general intent, meaning that the prosecution must prove only that the accused meant to do an act prohibited by law.
Specific Intent Specific intent crimes typically require that the defendant intentionally commit an act and intend to cause a particular result when committing that act. How to Tell? Talk to a Lawyer Like so many areas of law, determining whether a crime requires general or specific intent can be tricky.
Talk to a Lawyer Start here to find criminal defense lawyers near you. Practice Area Please select Zip Code. How it Works Briefly tell us about your case Provide your contact information Choose attorneys to contact you. Legal Information. Criminal Law Information. Proof and Defenses in Criminal Cases. Getting a Lawyer for your Criminal Case.
Steps in a Criminal Defense Case. Arraignment: Your First Court Appearance.
0コメント